Saturday, February 27, 2010

Interuption on the Move

The Experience
For my interruption, I set up a 'Language Assistance' booth on the 7:15pm Empire State Train which which went from New York to Albany. I taped the following sign up to the luggage rack above my seat

I also created a humorous yet informative pamphlet (seen below) for any visitors.
Interstice - Language Assistance




I also took pictures and video of my booth:





Sadly, the only person to ask what I was doing was the person checking tickets. I did notice one or two people staring at the sign and the pamphlets from a distance, but no one approached me.

Conceptualization
For my project I decided to challenge the idea of immediate interpersonal interaction from the relational aesthetics reading. I wanted my project to create long-term interpersonal interactions. What I imagined was an interstice that would shine a light on an abstract ability which is innate to every participant and vital in the creation of any dialogue yet very misunderstood; that ability is language. By getting participants to reflect on language for just one moment I hoped to inspire future instances of reflection, which would cause them to seek out those answers and create dialogues with other language users, igniting a larger conversation about language.

The setting for my project was something which I consider an exemplary interstice. Taking place on a train, the site of my project was located in a multi-layered physical interstice (i.e. It was set up in a row of seats, which is in between other rows of seats. In turn these rows are located within a train car, which is located in between other train cars. Finally, the train cars (a.k.a. the train) are constantly moving between two locations).

The train is an interesting location to examine the idea of public space. While the train itself is a public method of transportation, each passenger is entitled to privatize some portion of it (a contract which is instantiated at the moment they bought the ticket). However, one's privatized space is more open to intrusion by the public than in other situations. Of course there is a social etiquette which has developed to protect our private space in these circumstance (i.e. if your watching a movie use headphones, ask the person behind you if it is ok to recline your seat, etc) and it was these social constructs which I deliberately broke in order to interrupt the 'everyday life of the passenger'. By setting up my project in a privatized yet very public area it was easy to encroached on the space of others visually, which is why I put up my sign for 'Language Assistance' on the coat rack above my seats. I also placed the pamphlets on the fold-down table closest to the aisle. I would have used audio to attract (or annoy) more people, but I feared getting kicked off the train so I did not follow through with this.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Questions on Readings

Lefebvre, H. - Clearing the Ground
1) What do you think was the purpose of the first four sections (i.e. the two objections and replies)? Do you think this was an effective method of engaging the reader’s own views on the everyday?
2) How does Lefebvre's reconceptualization of the everyday as a level differ from the standard view that it is some sort of custom/praxis/ritual?
3) Do Lefebvre’s examples of people operating at the everyday level, undermine his reconceptualization? That is, has he truly revolutionized our way of thinking about the everyday or has he merely put a slightly different spin on how we view it?

Bourriaud, N. - Relational Aesthetics
1) Bourriaud brought up the idea of immediate experience and interpersonal engagement, describing art as a state of encounter. Do you think it is possible to create passive/subliminal art? What might that be like?
2) Bourriaud states that modernization has replaced people with impersonal machines in certain situations, which destroys opportunities for exchange. However, modernization has also brought us machines, such as computers, that can create personal connections in ways that were impossible before. Do you think these new forms of modernization are adequate replacements for the types of interactions they have destroyed?
3) Do you think Hana has been successful in bringing our class "to life as thought it were artwork"?

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Friday, February 12, 2010

Body, Meet Technology.



Read the full article here.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Autogeograme


View Autogeograme in a larger map

Sick!

I came down with something Saturday night/Sunday morning and am still not over it. Sorry I couldn't make it today. Have a good class everyone!

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Wayfinding Topics

  • Navigation Techniques and Disorientation in Cyberspace
  • Significance of object/entities in your virtual life
  • Design/Mapping of cyberspace? Possible or not?

Man's Life Saved By Webcam

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8496586.stm

This article highlights many of the concepts we discussed today: life/death, wayfinding ,the extent of an inventors intent. Because a webcam was placed on the beach for people to enjoy sunsets, a person hundreds of miles away was able to save a man's life. This to me illustrates an unusual type of occurrence in wayfinding. Normally people actively use tools to help them navigate the world. But here a tool, through its mere existence, resulted in the traveler being successfully navigated back home. Not only this, but the webcam was not even designed to monitor the area for lost travelers. This forces us to question the idea of an item's function. Even though an inventor has a set goal in mind, the function of an item is, as it would seem, only limited by it's user. This has interesting philosophical repercussions for art. When we create public art we are trying to engage the public with the surrounding space in some way and we design our project in a manner which we believe will best achieve this effect. Yet I question what kind of experience are we truly bringing to the viewer? How does the artist know if he has successfully reached the public?